{"id":357,"date":"2014-01-31T15:11:23","date_gmt":"2014-01-31T23:11:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.imaginary-institute.com\/blog\/?p=357"},"modified":"2014-01-31T15:11:23","modified_gmt":"2014-01-31T23:11:23","slug":"sensory-language","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.imaginary-institute.com\/blog\/2014\/01\/31\/sensory-language\/","title":{"rendered":"Sensory Language"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.imaginary-institute.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/piano-insides-300w.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-356\" alt=\"piano-insides-300w\" src=\"http:\/\/www.imaginary-institute.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/piano-insides-300w.jpg\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><\/a>Recently I had my piano tuned (it&#8217;s a gorgeous Steinway Model B originally built in 1887, and still going strong! The picture is of a similar, but newer, instrument). After playing it for a while I found that one note was consistently standing out and distracting me each time it sounded. I emailed my tuner, and we corresponded a bit over the nature of the sound. I found myself straining to find words to describe what I was hearing, and I realized that in everyday language, our different senses have very different sizes of vocabularies.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p><strong>Vision<\/strong> probably has the richest vocabulary, with all kinds of nuances for different colors, shapes, brightnesses, contrasts, and so on. Much of the language is metaphorical, describing &#8220;warm&#8221; and &#8220;cool&#8221; colors, for instance.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Taste<\/strong> seems to me to come in second, given the diversity and subtlety we have for describing everything from sweetness or saltiness to texture and what the pros call &#8220;mouth feel.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hearing<\/strong> and <strong>Smell<\/strong> seem to be pretty far behind both of the above. We have pretty limited vocabularies for these. To describe my problematic note, I was using words like &#8220;colder&#8221; and &#8220;limp,&#8221; because I just didn&#8217;t have anything more precise. Smell seems the same way to me, where we have a few very broad categories, but smaller distinctions are harder to describe.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, we have all the other senses: <strong>Touch<\/strong>, <strong>Proprioception<\/strong>, <strong>Balance<\/strong>, <strong>Temperature<\/strong>, and so on. Describing balance, for example, I&#8217;m pretty much limited to &#8220;I feel fine,&#8221; or &#8220;I feel woozy,&#8221; though maybe &#8220;I feel sea-sick&#8221; fits in-between. Touch is also impoverished: we don&#8217;t have a lot of language to describe the difference between how it feels to have your forearm stroked with a feather versus a piece of cardboard.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, specialists have their own vocabularies. We all know the stories of wine tasters who use bizarre words to compare their drinks, and I&#8217;m sure perfumers have a well-developed set of words to articulate the differences they work with every day.<\/p>\n<p>But my point here is that in everyday usage (or at least <em>my<\/em> everyday usage), these senses have very different sizes of vocabularies. Building on the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis, this suggests that we can infer the relative importance we assign to each of these senses by comparing their vocabularies. From my linguistically-casual point of view, that seems to make sense to me. But it would be nice to have at least a bit more descriptive power, so I don&#8217;t have to tell my piano tuner that the D an octave above middle C is sounding &#8220;cold&#8221;!<\/p>\n<p>By the way, he came back out and my piano now sounds beautiful.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Recently I had my piano tuned (it&#8217;s a gorgeous Steinway Model B originally built in 1887, and still going strong! The picture is of a similar, but newer, instrument). After playing it for a while I found that one note was consistently standing out and distracting me each time it sounded. I emailed my tuner, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-357","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.imaginary-institute.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/357","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.imaginary-institute.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.imaginary-institute.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.imaginary-institute.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.imaginary-institute.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=357"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.imaginary-institute.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/357\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":359,"href":"https:\/\/www.imaginary-institute.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/357\/revisions\/359"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.imaginary-institute.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=357"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.imaginary-institute.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=357"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.imaginary-institute.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=357"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}